Aku dalam Tuhan: Implikasi Teologi Proses pada Era Kontemporer

Suhermanto Ja’far

doi:10.20414/ujis.v16i2.182

Suhermanto Ja’far IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v16i2.182

Abstract

Theological implications in social lives are still worth analyzed. This paper discusses the authentic image of man as I in the relationship with God and the world. These relationships affect the nature of the world and the world to change the nature of God. The implications of the inclusion of God in the world is God’s presence to the world and the world is affected God. Immanent God is the God who is present in every human being, every living being, and the universe. Every human being is unique and as I am in the uniqueness of God is present. In the directionality that God wanted man and the world become “like Him”, they are united with him; He is involved in the principles and ways of working people and the world. Even though God is in everything and everything is in God, it does not mean that everything is identical, or equal with God. God that is “above” and present “in” the world to make people as I was in the Lord.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Affandi, Khozin. 2007. Fenomenologi: Pemahaman Awal Pikiran-Pikiran Edmund Husserl. Surabaya: eLKAF.

Bagus, Lorenz. 1991. Metafisika. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Berkhof, Hendrikus. 1986. Christian Faith: An Introduction to the Study of the Faith, revised ed., trans. Sierd Woudstra (ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Boer, Theodore de. 1978. The Development of Husserl’s Thought. London: Trans Mortinus Nijhhoff.

Buber, Martin. 1970. I and Thou. trans. W. Kauffman, Edinburgh. t.tp: tp.

Clayton, Philip. tt. “God and World”, in The Cambridge Companion to Postmodern Theology, Kevin J. Vanhoozer (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cobb, John Jr. 1965. A Christian Natural Theology, Based on the Thought of Alfred North Whitehead. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.

Cobb, John Jr. and David Ray Griffin. 1977. Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition. Westminster John Knox Press.

Cooper, John W. 2006. Panenteisme The Other God of the Philosophers: From Plato to the Present. Grand Rapids-MI: Baker Academic.

Drees, Willem B. “God and Contemporary Science: Philip Clayton's Defense of Panenteisme”, Zygon, 1999.

Emmett, Dorothy. “Whitehead and Alexander”, Process Studies, 1992, 137-48.

Epping, A. OFM. et. all. 1983. Filsafat ENSIE. Bandung: Jemmars.

Fakhry, Majid. 1983. A History of Islamic Philosoph. New York: Columbia University Press.

Ford, Lewis (ed.). 1973. Two Process Philosophers: Hartshorne’s Encounter with Whitehead, Tuhanassee. FL: American Academy of Religion.

Gillett, Carl. “Physicalism and Panenteisme: Good News and Bad News”, Faith and Philosophy. 2003.

Griffin, David Ray. 2004. “Panenteisme: A Postmodern Revelation”, in In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being, P. Clayton and A. Peacocke (eds.). Grand Rapids-MI: William B. Eerdmans.

Hartshorne, Charles dan William Reese. 1976. Philosophers Speak of God. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.

Huijbers, Theo. 1982. Manusia mencari Allah. Jogjakarta: Kanisius.

Ja’far, Suhermanto. 2003. Konsep Metafisika Moh. Iqbal. Jakarta: Tesis PPS Filsafat UI.

Moltmann, Jurgen. 1974. The Crucified God. Evanston, IL: Harper and Row.

Peursen, C.A. Van. 1988. Orientasi di Alam Filsafat, ter. Dick Hartoko. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Ritzer, George. 1996. Modern sociological Theory, 4th Edition. Singapura: the McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

Rowe, William L. “Does panenteisme reduce to panteisme? a response to Craig”, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2007.

Russell, Bertrand. 1974. History of Western Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Sheed’s. Dogmatic Theology. Volume 1-3. USA: Thomas Nelson Publisher, 1980.

Thilly, Frank. 1957. A History of Philosophy. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Weij, PA. Van der. 1985. Filosof-filosof Besar tentang Manusia. Jakarta: Gramedia.