Debates on Religious Studies In the Phenomenology Perspective and Its Contribution to Interfaith Tolerance
Abstract
The phenomenological approach in religious studies has played an essential role in uncovering the mysteries of religious experience. With the epoché concept, which refers to the meaning of "delaying all judgments", or it can be said as meaning with the intention of suspending an understanding, that is interpreted as "confinement" (bracketing), the researcher must temporarily let go of all his judgments or understanding of the phenomenon under study to obtain universal knowledge that is transcendental to the phenomenon of religion and experience the essence that they obtain. However, critics from experts for this phenomenological approach to religion still exist, in this case, summarized in three points: first, about the continuity of the phenomenology of religion as a philosophical tradition. Second, hidden theological assumptions or motives behind the phenomenological approach of religion. Third, what is the involvement of religious scientists in the public role as social scientists face current social and political realities or the challenges of religious scientists whether they accept the public role or do not face the reality of various problems faced by society.
Downloads
References
Adam, Charles J. “The Hermeneutics of Henry Corbin.” In Approaches to Islam In Religious Studies, edited by Richard C. Martin, 129–150. Tucson: The Arizona State University Press, 1985.
Ahimsa-Putra, Heddy Shri. “Fenomenologi Agama: Pendekatan Fenomenologi untuk Memahami Agama.” Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 20, no. 2 (2012): 271–304. http://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/walisongo/article/view/200.
Allen, Douglas. “Phenomenology of Religion.” In The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, edited by John R. Hinnells, 182–207. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.
Amin Abdullah, M. “al-Ta’wil al-‘Ilmi: Kearah Perubahan Paradigma Penafsiran Kitab Suci.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 39, no. 2 (2001): 359–391.
———. “Mempertautkan Ulum al-Din al-Fikr al-Islamy dan Dirasah Islamiyah.” Paper presented at the Workshop Pembelajaran Inovatif Berbasis Integrasi-Interkoneksi, Yogyakarta, 2008.
———. Studi Agama: Nornativitas atau Historisitas? Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004.
Anonym. “Phenomenology of Religion.” Wikipedia, 2019. Accessed February 18, 2019. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology_of_religion.
Arkoun, Mohamed. Ayna Huwa al-Fikr al-Mu’āshir. Beirut: Dār al-Saqi, 1992.
Bertens, K. Filsafat Barat Abad XX: Inggris-Jerman. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1990.
Bleicher, Josef. Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy and Critique. London and New York: Routledge, 1980.
Conant, James B. Modern Science and Modern Man. Garden City, New York: Doubleday Company, 1954.
Cox, James L. A Guide to the Phenomenology of Religion: Key Figures, Formative Influences and Subsequent Debates. New York: T&T Clark International, 2006.
———. Expressing the Sacred: An Introduction to the Phenomenology of Religion. Harare: University of Zimbabwe, 1992.
Dhavamony, Mariasusai. Phenomenology of Religion. Translated by Drikarya Religious Study Team. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1995.
Ekeke, Emeka Charles, and Chike Ekeopara. “Phenomenological Approach to the Study of Religion: A Historical Perspective.” European Journal of Scientific Research 44, no. 2 (August 2010): 266–274.
Erricker, Clive. “Pendekatan Fenomenologis.” In Aneka Pendekatan Studi Agama, edited by Peter Connolly, translated by Imam Khoiri. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2002.
al-Jābirī, Muḥammad ‘Ābid. Bunya al-’Aql al-’Arabī: Dirāsa Tahlīliyya Naqdiyya li Niẓam al-Ma’rifa al-Thaqāfa al- ’Arabiyya. Beirut: Markaz Dirāsāt al-Waḥdah al-‘Arabiyyah, 1990.
Martin, Richard C. Approaches to Islam in Religious Studies. Michigan: University of Arizona Press, 1985.
Moustakas, Clark. Phenomenological Research Methods. London: Sage Publications Inc, 1994.
Mudzhar, Atho. Pendekatan Studi Islam dalam Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2007.
Muhadjir, Noeng. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin, 1989.
Rapar, Jan Hendrik. Pengantar Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1996.
Schemmel, Annemarie. Deciphering the Signs of God: A Phenomenological Approach to Islam. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.
Schuon, Frithjof. Islam dan Filsafat Perrenial. Bandung: Mizan, 1998.
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. “The True Meaning of Scripture: An Empirical Historian's Non-Reductionist Interpretation of The Qur’an.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 11 (1980).
———. What Is Scripture? A Comparative Approach. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.
Waardenburg, Jacques. Classical Approach to the Study of Religion. Paris, Mouton: The Hague, 1973.
Copyright (c) 2019 Ulumuna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.